Movie #129 - Brewster's Millions

"An American excess story."

After doing some research for this blog post review, I learned that this movie is a remake of a number of films of the same title from the early era of movies. This film has been made in different varieties in 1914, 1921, 1935, and 1945, with the 1985 version being the latest. There is also rumours that another remake is in the works for 2012 release, but I'll stick to what I know.

The concept of all of these films, including this version is that Richard Pryor's character of Monty Brewster inherits $30 million, but must spend it in 30 days in order to inherit $300 million that he is entitled to. Also, there are stipulations. He must not inform anyone that he has to spend in this fashion and he cannot buy anything that he can keep after the 30 days are over - removing the aspects of buying property, investments, etc.

Probably everyone's dream of the 1980's, to learn of a distant relative that has given you such a windfall. The act of spending the money itself is entertaining due to its extravagance. I enjoyed the plot of this quirky 80's film and its cast of comedic actors to provide support to Pryor's character.

In addition to Pryor, you have supporting roles offered by the likes of Stephen Collins, John Candy, Jerry Orbach, Lonette McKee, and Hume Cronyn as his ominous distant relative. Pryor is a treat to watch in this film, despite the fact that the humour and comedy throughout the film are actually quite limited.

The quest to spend this money is both frustrating and creative. $30 million is quite a sum, especially if you cannot keep anything and have to spend every penny. So if you've ever dreamt of doing this in your lifetime, this is a movie that you will enjoy.

Movie #122 - Star Trek: The Motion Picture

"The human adventure is just beginning."

After many years of syndication, 1979 marked the return of the crew from the Enterprise. This time, on the big screen. The much anticipated return of Star Trek and its original crew was definitely exciting for all Trekkies. Unfortunately, I am too young to remember this film on the big screen for I was not born yet, however, I have watched this movie many times and believe its a good one. It definitely does not rank that high in terms of the entire lot of Star Trek films, inclusive of the TNG group and the most recent prequel completed by J.J. Abrams, however, its a good start.

Nominated for three Academy Awards, including Best Visual Effects and Original Score, this film brings back the familiar crew to their leap to the big screen. The storyline of this film is a little weak, but what was to be expected for a long hiatus from television and a big budget. The story behind this movie is that a planetary force is making its way to Earth and the Enterprise is sent to investigate and see if they can stop it from destroying the planet.

Although compelling and beautifully shot despite the limited special effects of the late 70's, the story is extremely slow and the drama that we were accustomed show with the television cult classic was lost in this drawn out, 2.5 hour version of a poorly edited television episode. The graphics are top notch for the era, however, most of the budget went to making this film a cinematic piece as opposed to creating a solid plot or developing the characters further beyond what we knew of them in the show.

Unfortunately, this is exactly what was done in other Star Trek films as well. I am a big fan of Gene Roddenberry, but he always assumed that movie-goers watching his movies knew about the characters involved. However, character development is the biggest aspect lacking in many science fiction blockbusters - we spend too much time worrying about the special effects and the action sequences, we forget that some fans just want a good story to be told.

Despite this flaw, the first installment of the movie franchise is a hit overall. Its much better than Star Trek III, and probably better than IV and V as well. I liked VI and obviously, everyone enjoys the movie Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan, which is one of my personal favourites as well.

This movie does have some new cast members in the likes of Stephen Collins (known for his role as the father on 7th Heaven) and Persis Khambatta (a former Miss India from the early 60's). Both characters are developed as the main side storyline of the movie and you gravitate towards the romantic background offered by these two side characters from the main cast. However, even with these strong performances of these side cast members, the main cast is very limited in their reprised roles.

The Spock / Kirk play between characters is not focused upon in this film as opposed to the contrast in the television show and further sequels. The poor ranking of this film in the Star Trek franchise can probably be attributed to the lack of interaction between Kirk and Spock, as the focus is on attempting to develop Collins' character of Commander William Decker.

In the end, this is a good movie to start a Star Trek marathon off from (which by the way is taking place on Labour Day weekend 2009 in Canada on Space Network), however, it could easily put you to sleep as well - which for some isn't necessarily a bad thing... but only if you are narcoleptic.